Executive Order 13928 of June 11, 2020 (Revoked 4/3/2021 and reinstated on 1/20/2025)

Date issued: Jun. 11 2020

TURBOFAC Commentary (332 words)

Notes: - see comment to Initial Rescissions of Harmful Executive Orders and Actions (Executive Order Jan. 20, 2025)


This EO was issued on 6-11-20, and was subsequently incorporated into the CFR as an appendix to the International Criminal Court-Related Sanctions Regulations.

On 4-1-21 President Biden revoked EO 13928 through Executive Order on the Termination of Emergency With Respect to the International Criminal Court, thereby removing the authority for the International Criminal Court-Related Sanctions Regulations, which were subsequently removed from the CFR.

On 1-20-25, the EO revoking EO 13928 was revoked by Initial Rescissions of Harmful Executive Orders and Actions (Executive Order Jan. 20, 2025).

Accordingly, it appears as though EO 13928 is once again an active sanctions authority by operation of law, though the ICC regulations that were removed from the CFR are presumably no longer effective, nor are the designations that were made pursuant to the authority prior to the issuance of this EO.

---

1) The designation criteria in this EO are regular, with certain “primary” designation criteria not of interest to the typical legitimate commercial actor, along with the standard “derivative designation” criteria, i.e. “materially assisting” blocked persons, acting on behalf of blocked persons and being owned or controlled by blocked persons. For comments on the administration of those standard designation criteria, refer to General Note on Secondary Sanctions and “Derivative Designation” Criteria; Identification of the Gap Between the Theoretical and Practical Scopes of Authorities Targeting Transactions with no U.S. Nexus; Enforcement Risk Management (System Ed. Note).

3) See Open Society Justice Initiative et al v. Trump et al (1:20-cv-08121) (SDNY 2020) - OFAC/USG Memo. in Opp. to Pl. Motion for P.I., affirming that Sec. 11(b) of the EO is interpreted such that the non-waivable IEEPA exemptions apply to the blocking prohibition applied even though the then-in-force ICC regulations omitted reference to the exceptions. That document also discusses the "material assistance" derivative designation criterion found in this EO.