OFAC FAQ (Current) # 419 - Ukraine-/Russia-related Sanctions

Date issued: Nov. 28 2017

Last substantive commentary amendment:
Apr. 03 2024

TURBOFAC Commentary (292 words)

Notes:

1) Refer to Haverly Systems, Inc. (2019); an enforcement action against a common seller of software for receiving payment from a Directive 2 SSI entity in connection with an invoice constituting "new debt."

2) Note that OFAC specifies that "offering payment terms of longer than the applicable tenor specified in the relevant Directive to an SSI entity generally constitutes a prohibited dealing in debt of the SSI entity," suggesting that offering a 90 day payment term for an SSI entity subject to a 60 day restriction is prohibited even if the payment is made within 30 days.

3) Compare FAQ 410. OFAC makes certain exceptions to the principle applied in the deferred purchase agreement context, in which OFAC starts the clock on the day that the obligation to purchase an asset is entered into.

4) The treatment of long-term projects as having a clock starting from the date of a "final invoice" (term of art) is presumably based on an assumption that the final invoice will be issued within a period of time following the completion of the project that is consistent with the practice of whatever the industry at issue may be. Obviously OFAC would not permit the completion of a project, and subsequent stalling on sending a final invoice to create more time for which the SSI has to pay the invoice. By the same token, it is unlikely that OFAC would accept, in the situation of a sale of goods, an invoice being sent with significant delay following the actual transfer of title or ownership of the good, particularly if doing so is not consistent with industry practice.

* See generally General Note on the Prohibitions on Dealings in “New Debt” of Certain Sanctions Targets (System Ed. Note)