Ed. Note: if you’re new to TURBOFAC, please take note that the text string filtration function generally shouldn’t be used for terms such as “ordinarily resident,” “causing” or “new debt”. For research on the meaning of words and phrases such as those, i.e. terms central to the key legal issues in sanctions law that appear on a cross-programmatic basis, you’re typically better off locating and checking the appropriate box in the “Key Legal Issues” search category, which will limit the results to those that have been manually assessed as being relevant for the interpretation of the terms at issue.
Try typing your search term (“ordinarily resident,” “new debt,” or something else) in the “Find a Search Filter” box at the top of the page, and the corresponding “Key Legal Issues” check box will pop up instantly, if one exists. Once you check the box (e.g. “new debt,” with ~55 results), you can always use the text string filtration function to further refine your search (e.g. by typing “invoice” and narrowing the ~55 results to ~10).
Note in addition that the same applies to text string searches such as “14071” (if you’re looking for items related to EO 14071). By typing “14071” in the “Find a Search Filter” field up top, you will be able to instantly narrow the results down to items manually assessed as relating to EO 14071. Ditto terms such as “515.204” or “Iran General License G” (try the “Discrete Legal Provision” search category).
Please contact [email protected] or [email protected] with any questions on search results and efficiency.
Please click "Apply Text String Filters" again after clicking the "Close" button immediately below.
1) This letter generally restates 515.542(b) and (c), as they were in September of 2009 (see https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CFR-2010-title31-vol3/xml/CFR-2010-title31-vol3-part515.xml). The provisions have been amended slightly since 9/8/2010.
Further information about this particular applicant and its roaming-related agreements with the Cuban government can be found at https://www.fcc.gov/document/iconnect-wholesale-inc-dba-telecuba.
Note that the letter refers specifically to "roaming services in Cuba for U.S. cellular telephones". At the time the letter was issued, the GL authorized "...the provision of telecommunications services between the United States and Cuba..." Would that have covered a U.S. cellular phone user in Cuba receiving a call from a third country? The provision was later amended to refer to "telecommunications services related to the transmission or the receipt of telecommunications involving Cuba," thereby mooting the interpretive question, but there is...