31 CFR § 594.509 - Transactions related to mail authorized.

Date issued: Jun. 06 2003

TURBOFAC Commentary (263 words)

Notes:

1) Compare the scope of this GL with, for example, the 560.508 (ITSR). This GL would appear to authorize both the actual sending of mail to an SDGT, the payment to a third-party common carrier for the delivery of the mail, and, presumably, the actual delivery of the mail itself.

Note that there are no personal communications or informational materials exemptions in the GTSR. Refer to General Note on the Lack of Berman Amendment Exemptions for the GTSR. Unlike IEEPA, UNPA permits the prohibition of communications between the U.S. and persons designated pursuant to an authority relying on UNPA. This means that, unlike the case with the mail-related GLs in embargo programs, which authorize mail treated transactions to the extent that they are not otherwise exempt, this GL "occupies the field" of permissible mail-related transactions involving SDGTs. As a result, the scope of the license, for "personal communications not involving a transfer of anything of value," was chosen by OFAC of its own volition, not mandated by the IEEPA exemption that is phrased in virtually identical language.

Query why this GL exists. It is possible that OFAC considered that, UNPA notwithstanding, a blanket prohibition on all telecommunications transactions with SDGTs would either i) not withstand First Amendment scrutiny, or otherwise ii) could not be justified as within the scope of the U.N.-related sanctions that serve as the basis for invoking UNPA as an authority for the GTSR in the first place.

2) See General Note on General Licenses for Transactions Related to Telecommunications and Mail.