If this is your first time here, take a look at our FAQ page and get a sense of our unique scope of coverage by perusing the Research System interface.
Also, please note that this website is not yet fully functional on mobile browsers. We recommend adjusting your mobile browser settings to view the site in Desktop Mode.
If this is your first time here, take a look at our FAQ page and get a sense of our unique scope of coverage by perusing the Research System interface.
Ed. Note: if you’re new to TURBOFAC, please take note that the text string filtration function generally shouldn’t be used for terms such as “ordinarily resident,” “causing” or “new debt”. For research on the meaning of words and phrases such as those, i.e. terms central to the key legal issues in sanctions law that appear on a cross-programmatic basis, you’re typically better off locating and checking the appropriate box in the “Key Legal Issues” search category, which will limit the results to those that have been manually assessed as being relevant for the interpretation of the terms at issue.
Try typing your search term (“ordinarily resident,” “new debt,” or something else) in the “Find a Search Filter” box at the top of the page, and the corresponding “Key Legal Issues” check box will pop up instantly, if one exists. Once you check the box (e.g. “new debt,” with ~55 results), you can always use the text string filtration function to further refine your search (e.g. by typing “invoice” and narrowing the ~55 results to ~10).
Note in addition that the same applies to text string searches such as “14071” (if you’re looking for items related to EO 14071). By typing “14071” in the “Find a Search Filter” field up top, you will be able to instantly narrow the results down to items manually assessed as relating to EO 14071. Ditto terms such as “515.204” or “Iran General License G” (try the “Discrete Legal Provision” search category).
Please contact [email protected] or [email protected] with any questions on search results and efficiency.
Please click "Apply Text String Filters" again after clicking the "Close" button immediately below.
Date issued: Sep. 30 2026
Last substantive commentary amendment:
Oct. 02 2026
[9-30-26 Update – FAQ amended reflect the revocation of the banking GL for “independent private sector entrepreneurs”]
1) The status of “online payment platforms” under 515.584(h)(1) and 515.314
515.584(h)(1) of the CACR authorizes “[a]ny banking institution, as defined in § 515.314, that is a person subject to U.S. jurisdiction…to open and maintain accounts solely in the name of a Cuban national located in Cuba for the purposes only of receiving payments in the United States in connection with transactions authorized pursuant to, or exempt from the prohibitions of, [the CACR] and remitting such payments to Cuba”. Prior to 5-28-24, this FAQ provided guidance on what is (as of 5-28-24) now 515.584(h)(1) of the CACR. The prior version of the FAQ, giving an example of a transaction eligible for 515.584(h)(1), used the example of “an author who is a Cuban national located in Cuba [who] may open an account with a bank or online payment platform in the United States to receive payments for sales of her book”. The FAQ was amended on 5-28-24 such that it includes the example, but talks about payments being remitted to Cuba “through an online payment platform” from a “bank account” in the U.S., with no mention of actually opening an account with an “online payment platform”.
Query: does OFAC intend to suggest that Cuban nationals cannot open accounts with “online payment platforms” run by entities that qualify for the broad definition of “banking institution” (as defined at 515.314 of the CACR)? Probably not. Instead, the change appears to reflect the fact that the question asked is whether “U.S. banks [may] open and operate accounts,” and a “bank” is generally understood to refer to a smaller range of entities than a “banking institution, as defined in § 515.314”. All this is to say that the prior version of this FAQ strongly suggested that what is now 515.584(h)(1) covers the opening of accounts with online payment platforms, and if OFAC intended on effectively revoking that portion of the GL with the 5-28-24 amendment of this FAQ, one might have expected a clear statement on that point.
2) Where applicable, OFAC interprets the Berman Amendment as exempting transactions incident to the commercial import and export of informational materials, including payment for those materials (see e.g. Case No. IA-2012-299245-1). However, the opening and/or maintaining of U.S. bank accounts by sanctioned persons for those purposes is not considered within the scope of transactions incident to the sale of the exempt items, such as payment processing. This GL is specific to Cuba.
3) The version of the FAQ revised as of 5-28-24 adds language—beginning with “Additionally, pursuant to 31 CFR § 515.584(h)(2)”—to account for the addition of the GL at 515.584(h)(2).That GL provides that:
“Any banking institution, as defined in § 515.314, that is a person subject to U.S. jurisdiction is authorized to open and maintain accounts solely in the name of a Cuban national who is an independent private sector entrepreneur, as defined in § 515.340, for the purposes of conducting transactions authorized pursuant to, or exempt from the prohibitions of [the CACR].”
The FAQ provides guidance giving examples of “authorized” transactions for which the accounts could be used (certain imports of goods from Cuba (515.582) or exports of goods to Cuba (515.533)). The FAQ also specifies that accounts opened for “independent private sector entrepreneurs” can, unlike accounts authorized pursuant to 515.571(a)(5), be maintained and accessed for “independent private sector entrepreneurs” irrespective of whether such persons are “located in the United States, Cuba, or another country”. This is important because many persons meeting the definition of “independent private sector entrepreneurs” may not be physically located in Cuba, even if they own an entity that is located in Cuba. See 515.340.