Ed. Note: if you’re new to TURBOFAC, please take note that the text string filtration function generally shouldn’t be used for terms such as “ordinarily resident,” “causing” or “new debt”. For research on the meaning of words and phrases such as those, i.e. terms central to the key legal issues in sanctions law that appear on a cross-programmatic basis, you’re typically better off locating and checking the appropriate box in the “Key Legal Issues” search category, which will limit the results to those that have been manually assessed as being relevant for the interpretation of the terms at issue.
Try typing your search term (“ordinarily resident,” “new debt,” or something else) in the “Find a Search Filter” box at the top of the page, and the corresponding “Key Legal Issues” check box will pop up instantly, if one exists. Once you check the box (e.g. “new debt,” with ~55 results), you can always use the text string filtration function to further refine your search (e.g. by typing “invoice” and narrowing the ~55 results to ~10).
Note in addition that the same applies to text string searches such as “14071” (if you’re looking for items related to EO 14071). By typing “14071” in the “Find a Search Filter” field up top, you will be able to instantly narrow the results down to items manually assessed as relating to EO 14071. Ditto terms such as “515.204” or “Iran General License G” (try the “Discrete Legal Provision” search category).
Please contact [email protected] or [email protected] with any questions on search results and efficiency.
Please click "Apply Text String Filters" again after clicking the "Close" button immediately below.
1) From a legal basis standpoint, this enforcement action is somewhat unusual. If Mondo had simply made payments to a third party for onward transfer to a North Korean entity, it would have been straightforward and comparable to other North Korea-related actions. Compare e.g. Enforcement Release - Godfrey Phillips India Limited (non-U.S. person causing payments to be routed through the U.S. financial system where payments derived from North Korea and the alleged violator used "several third-country intermediary parties to receive payment"). Here, however, Mondo made payments to a third country company that were not routed onward to North Korea, but instead were "to satisfy debts [the North Korean company] had to [the payment recipients]". This sort of arrangement entails funds transfers in which the North Korean government entity had an "interest," and OFAC also regards the transfers as constituting the "export financial services...