Ed. Note: if you’re new to TURBOFAC, please take note that the text string filtration function generally shouldn’t be used for terms such as “ordinarily resident,” “causing” or “new debt”. For research on the meaning of words and phrases such as those, i.e. terms central to the key legal issues in sanctions law that appear on a cross-programmatic basis, you’re typically better off locating and checking the appropriate box in the “Key Legal Issues” search category, which will limit the results to those that have been manually assessed as being relevant for the interpretation of the terms at issue.
Try typing your search term (“ordinarily resident,” “new debt,” or something else) in the “Find a Search Filter” box at the top of the page, and the corresponding “Key Legal Issues” check box will pop up instantly, if one exists. Once you check the box (e.g. “new debt,” with ~55 results), you can always use the text string filtration function to further refine your search (e.g. by typing “invoice” and narrowing the ~55 results to ~10).
Note in addition that the same applies to text string searches such as “14071” (if you’re looking for items related to EO 14071). By typing “14071” in the “Find a Search Filter” field up top, you will be able to instantly narrow the results down to items manually assessed as relating to EO 14071. Ditto terms such as “515.204” or “Iran General License G” (try the “Discrete Legal Provision” search category).
Please contact [email protected] or [email protected] with any questions on search results and efficiency.
Please click "Apply Text String Filters" again after clicking the "Close" button immediately below.
1) Compare Civil Enforcement Information - Essentra FZE, which is based on very similar facts, i.e. a non-U.S. person using U.S. banks to receive payment for tobacco-related exports to North Korea, and doing so in an evasive manner. As with Essentra, here OFAC charges the alleged violator with "causing" the "facilitation" of the underlying exportation of goods to North Korea, and "causing" the exportation of financial services to North Korea. While the facts are similar in some respects, the reason why this case was a "non-egregious" civil violation, while Essentra was an "egregious case" that resulted in criminal prosecution and a Deferred Prosecution Agreement, is that in Essentra the alleged violator "willfully violated the NKSR," while here Godfrey Phillips India Limited "acted recklessly when it failed to exercise a minimal degree of caution or care...