Venezuela Defense of Human Rights and Civil Society Act of 2014 [Selected provisions]

Date issued: Dec. 18 2014

TURBOFAC Commentary (279 words)

Notes:

1) For a discussion of the evidently limited-to-nonexistence practical impact of this statute, see General Note on the Venezuela Sanctions Regulations, the Blocking of the Government of Venezuela and other Venezuela-related EOs (System Ed. Note). In short, there are two Venezuela related EOs that cite this statute as authority, and therefore "implement" the statute to some degree, but OFAC does not appear to consider any Venezuelan to be designated "pursuant to" this statute. Part of the reason for this may be that the designation criteria in Sec. 5 of the statute are far narrower than those that appear in the EOs that partially implement the statute, especially EO 13580, providing for sectoral sanctions that are quite clearly not within the scope of this statute. Compare comments to Executive Order 13851 of November 27, 2018 - Blocking Property of Certain Persons Contributing to the Situation in Nicaragua. OFAC has designated persons pursuant to a Nicaragua-related statute that is broadly similar to this one, where there is an EO that covers substantially the same ground as the associated EO, but when it has done so, it is made explicit.

For practical purposes, the fact that designations are not made pursuant to this statute means that the import exception in the statute does not apply. See General Note on "Import Exceptions" in Certain Program-Specific Sanctions Statutes (System Ed. Note). The flipside of that, however, is that persons designated pursuant to EOs "implementing" this statute are presumably eligible for favorable licensing policy treatment under TSRA. See General Note on the Cross Programmatic Relevance of TSRA, as it relates to Agricultural Commodities, Medicine and Medical Devices (System Ed. Note).