General Note on "Import Exceptions" in Certain Program-Specific Sanctions Statutes (System Ed. Note)

You've hit a wall. Sign in if you have an account, learn more about TURBOFAC and subscription options, or purchase access to the text of the document on this page, the native .pdf file, and the associated TURBOFAC original commentary.
TURBOFAC is a module of the compliance platform OverRuled. To learn more about OverRuled, visit www.overruled.com.

TURBOFAC Commentary (4224 words)

General Note on "Import Exceptions" in Certain Program-Specific Sanctions Statutes (System Ed. Note)

1) BACKGROUND

Starting with IFCA in 2013, a feature of that statute and the overwhelming majority of all blocking-related sanctions statutes issued since then is that it provides for an "exception" for imports.

Section 1244(c)(1)(B) of IFCA, a secondary sanctions statute providing for IEEPA-style asset blocking in certain circumstances, provides that:

"The requirement to block and prohibit all transactions in all property and interests in property [ ] shall not include the authority to impose sanctions on the importation of goods."

Similar provisions are found in, e.g., Sec. 1263(b)(2)(C) of the Global Magnitsky Human Rights Accountability Act; Sec 5. (c)(3) of the Nicaragua Human Rights and Anticorruption Act of 2018; Sec. 5(b)(3) of the Venezuela Defense of Human...