Ed. Note: if you’re new to TURBOFAC, please take note that the text string filtration function generally shouldn’t be used for terms such as “ordinarily resident,” “causing” or “new debt”. For research on the meaning of words and phrases such as those, i.e. terms central to the key legal issues in sanctions law that appear on a cross-programmatic basis, you’re typically better off locating and checking the appropriate box in the “Key Legal Issues” search category, which will limit the results to those that have been manually assessed as being relevant for the interpretation of the terms at issue.
Try typing your search term (“ordinarily resident,” “new debt,” or something else) in the “Find a Search Filter” box at the top of the page, and the corresponding “Key Legal Issues” check box will pop up instantly, if one exists. Once you check the box (e.g. “new debt,” with ~55 results), you can always use the text string filtration function to further refine your search (e.g. by typing “invoice” and narrowing the ~55 results to ~10).
Note in addition that the same applies to text string searches such as “14071” (if you’re looking for items related to EO 14071). By typing “14071” in the “Find a Search Filter” field up top, you will be able to instantly narrow the results down to items manually assessed as relating to EO 14071. Ditto terms such as “515.204” or “Iran General License G” (try the “Discrete Legal Provision” search category).
Please contact [email protected] or [email protected] with any questions on search results and efficiency.
Please click "Apply Text String Filters" again after clicking the "Close" button immediately below.
* For general background on the litigation to which this item and several others in the Research System pertain, see Background Note re: United States v. Alavi Found. (In re 650 Fifth Ave. & Related Props.) and Related Cases. The following assumes familiarity with that background.
1) This opinion relates to a widely reported on case with a massive docket that involves an interesting fact pattern and a rare opportunity for a circuit court of appeals to opine on the meaning of "owned or controlled" within the meaning of 560.304 (Government of Iran). The decision can have ramifications for all other sanctions provisions attaching to persons "controlled" by other persons, where "controlled" or "otherwise controlled" is left undefined.
There was a civil forfeiture case in which the primary target was a New York corporation consisting primarily of an office building. That corporation...