Notable "Derivative" Designations - Tempbank (Russia)

Date issued: May. 08 2014

TURBOFAC Commentary (241 words)

Notes:

1) Refer to Introductory Note Common to all Derivative Designation Notices Included in the Research System (System Ed. Note). That note explains the specific criteria used for determining which designation notices are included.

2) NOTE SPECIFIC TO THIS DESIGNATION NOTICE

This designation appears to satisfy the criteria described in the "Introductory Note." In this case, the scale of the conduct at issue appears to explain the designation of the bank, as distinguishable from other cases of financial services being provided to the Government of Syria. The designation is also notable for the fact that a non-Syrian bank official was designated along with the bank. Two years subsequent to this, OFAC designated nine other executive and supervisory board members connected to the bank.

Note that OFAC has, subsequent to this designation, made relatively clear that it will "aggressively target for designation any person who provides support to the [Assad] regime, for example by facilitating exports to or imports from the Government of Syria, including government-owned entities, unless such exportation or importation is otherwise exempt or authorized." See OFAC Advisory to the Maritime Petroleum Shipping Community: Sanctions Risks Related to Petroleum Shipments involving Iran and Syria (March, 2019). In practice, oil, arms and major financial services have been the only type of international trade transactions resulting in derivative designations pursuant to EO 13582, but EO 13582 is used a quasi-secondary sanctions authority, at least to cover particularly sensitive transactions.