Ed. Note: if you’re new to TURBOFAC, please take note that the text string filtration function generally shouldn’t be used for terms such as “ordinarily resident,” “causing” or “new debt”. For research on the meaning of words and phrases such as those, i.e. terms central to the key legal issues in sanctions law that appear on a cross-programmatic basis, you’re typically better off locating and checking the appropriate box in the “Key Legal Issues” search category, which will limit the results to those that have been manually assessed as being relevant for the interpretation of the terms at issue.
Try typing your search term (“ordinarily resident,” “new debt,” or something else) in the “Find a Search Filter” box at the top of the page, and the corresponding “Key Legal Issues” check box will pop up instantly, if one exists. Once you check the box (e.g. “new debt,” with ~55 results), you can always use the text string filtration function to further refine your search (e.g. by typing “invoice” and narrowing the ~55 results to ~10).
Note in addition that the same applies to text string searches such as “14071” (if you’re looking for items related to EO 14071). By typing “14071” in the “Find a Search Filter” field up top, you will be able to instantly narrow the results down to items manually assessed as relating to EO 14071. Ditto terms such as “515.204” or “Iran General License G” (try the “Discrete Legal Provision” search category).
Please contact [email protected] or [email protected] with any questions on search results and efficiency.
Please click "Apply Text String Filters" again after clicking the "Close" button immediately below.
1) Unlike all or virtually all other original OFAC FAQs issued in recent years, FAQ # 892 was issued without a corresponding notice on OFAC's "recent actions" page. (https://ofac.treasury.gov/recent-actions). It is possible that the impetus behind the FAQ was the release, the following day, of Civil Enforcement Information - MoneyGram Payment Systems, Inc. In that enforcement release, OFAC noted that "[o]nce MoneyGram began screening [ ] transactions [related to federal inmates that it had previously not screened], it nonetheless continued to process transactions on behalf of blocked persons in federal prisons due to other screening, technology, and fuzzy logic failures, as well as limited instances of human error."
2) See Civil Enforcement Information - Payoneer Inc., referencing use of "weak algorithms" for screening as an aggravating factor. OFAC does not say whether use of only "the original Soundex and Jaro-Winkler algorithms" previously used for OFAC's own screening tool would now qualify as insufficient due diligence, but it seems likely (at least for payment processors).