OFAC FAQ (Current) # 856 - Executive Order (E.O.) 13902, "Imposing Sanctions With Respect to Additional Sectors of Iran"

Date issued: Dec. 07 2020

TURBOFAC Commentary (411 words)

Notes:

1) See comment to FAQ # 844 concerning the relationship between the ITSR, Iran GL L and the secondary sanctions provisions at EO 13902.

OFAC's statement concerning "payments made to Iran involving blocked Iranian persons [] in connection with awards, orders, decisions, or settlement of claims" is not unique to this FAQ. It is, rather, consistent with OFAC's longstanding interpretation of the ITSR GLs concerning litigation involving Iran. Compare e.g. Case No. IA-2013-300347-1. For a U.S. person involved in Iran-related litigation outside of the U.S. pursuant to 560.510 of the ITSR, the collection and/or payment of funds resulting from judgments is not generally licensed as "ordinarily incident" to the conduct of the underlying litigation. This is true even when a payment is owed to or from a non-blocked person that is "in" or "ordinarily resident in" Iran.

2) For classification purposes, we treat the above as an implied interpretation of the term "significant transaction," as it appears in EO 13902.

3) This FAQ provides novel interpretive guidance on the scope of 560.510 and 560.525 of the ITSR. The FAQ says that the scope of 560.510 and 560.525 includes:

"transactions or activities related to the defense of individuals in legal proceedings in Iran brought by the Government of Iran, including any arrest, investigation, prosecution, or detention. Such permissible transactions and activities may include reasonable and customary payments for the provision of legal services, bail and/or bond payments, judicial costs and fees, costs for the production of documents and appearances of witnesses, and payment of experts."

Many modern general licenses for the provision of legal services specify that “U.S. persons who provide services authorized by [the GL] do not need to obtain specific authorization to contract for related services that are ordinarily incident to the provision of those legal services, such as those provided by private investigators or expert witnesses, or to pay for such services.” (See e.g. 520.506).

This FAQ suggests that “costs for the production of documents”—to which no explicit reference is made in the legal services general licenses—would be included within the scope of transactions ordinarily incident to the provision of legal services. The authorization for "bail and/or bond payments" is also notable as included in the FAQ but absent from the text of the relevant GLs.

4) Refer generally to General Note on "Counterfactual Secondary Sanctions and Derivative Designation Safe Harbors" in Certain OFAC Guidance and FAQs (System Ed. Note).