If this is your first time here, take a look at our FAQ page and get a sense of our unique scope of coverage by perusing the Research System interface.
Also, please note that this website is not yet fully functional on mobile browsers. We recommend adjusting your mobile browser settings to view the site in Desktop Mode.
If this is your first time here, take a look at our FAQ page and get a sense of our unique scope of coverage by perusing the Research System interface.
Ed. Note: if you’re new to TURBOFAC, please take note that the text string filtration function generally shouldn’t be used for terms such as “ordinarily resident,” “causing” or “new debt”. For research on the meaning of words and phrases such as those, i.e. terms central to the key legal issues in sanctions law that appear on a cross-programmatic basis, you’re typically better off locating and checking the appropriate box in the “Key Legal Issues” search category, which will limit the results to those that have been manually assessed as being relevant for the interpretation of the terms at issue.
Try typing your search term (“ordinarily resident,” “new debt,” or something else) in the “Find a Search Filter” box at the top of the page, and the corresponding “Key Legal Issues” check box will pop up instantly, if one exists. Once you check the box (e.g. “new debt,” with ~55 results), you can always use the text string filtration function to further refine your search (e.g. by typing “invoice” and narrowing the ~55 results to ~10).
Note in addition that the same applies to text string searches such as “14071” (if you’re looking for items related to EO 14071). By typing “14071” in the “Find a Search Filter” field up top, you will be able to instantly narrow the results down to items manually assessed as relating to EO 14071. Ditto terms such as “515.204” or “Iran General License G” (try the “Discrete Legal Provision” search category).
Please contact [email protected] or [email protected] with any questions on search results and efficiency.
Please click "Apply Text String Filters" again after clicking the "Close" button immediately below.
1) In general, this FAQ appears to be of the genre of FAQs issued in response to general inquiries related to a given subject, as opposed to an FAQ issued to clarify otherwise vague aspects of the law. The “official business” provisions addressed (542.513, 542.211(d) and 542.522) clearly apply to the “contractors and grantees” of the United Nations and the U.S. government.
OFAC has issued very little public guidance that addresses the “official business” provisions (which are similarly scoped cross-programmatically and come in the form of GLs and exemptions). For an in-depth discussion of the contours of the scope of the provisions, as addressed by OFAC in a number of unpublished guidance letters, see General Note on Exemptions and General Licenses for the “Official Business” of the U.S. Government (and/or United Nations) and Employees, Contractors, or Grantees Thereof.
To the extent that the FAQ could be said to constitute “interpretive guidance” there are a few statements that are now on the public record that confirm interpretations contained in the Research System guidance letters. One is that the “official business” provision applies to “Federal Government and its employees, grantees, or contractors,” implying that activities of the “Federal Government” are no less authorized than transactions of “employees, grantees, or contractors” of the Federal Government. This may appear obvious from a policy standpoint, but the wording of the standard “official business” provision refers to transactions “for the conduct of the official business of the Federal Government by employees, grantees, or contractors thereof,” which leaves vague the question of whether the authorizations cover transactions ordinarily incident to those of the Federal Government when performed by persons other than those meeting the definitions of “employees, grantees, or contractors.” They do (refer to the System Note).
In addition, OFAC distinguishes between 542.522 (GL) and 542.211(d) (exemption) in a way that suggests that the “must show contract” requirement of 542.522 only applies where it is explicit found, rather than something that is implicit in all “official business” provisions. Accord Case No. SY-2019-364717-1.
Finally, it is worth calling attention to the reference to “stabilization and early recovery-related activities and transactions in support of their official business”. Without any guidance at all, one might be inclined to read “official business of” the UN/USG restrictively. However, the general license at 542.522 extends to transactions “ordinarily incident” to those covered by 542.522, and OFAC has never suggested that the “official business” provisions are broader or narrower depending on whether they come in the form of an exemption or GL.
2) While EO 13224 and the GTSR contain no broad "official business" provision, see Syria-related GL 1 (Official Business of the United States Government) (for EO 13894). A number of Syrian government-related persons are blocked pursuant to EO 13894. One might be inclined to read the FAQ as implying that OFAC would not have a favorable licensing policy for "stabilization and early recovery-related activities" of the UN or NGOs that are prohibited by EO 13894.
3) Refer generally to General Note on "Counterfactual Secondary Sanctions and Derivative Designation Safe Harbors" in Certain OFAC Guidance and FAQs (System Ed. Note).