OFAC FAQ (Current) # 657 - Executive Order 13850 "Blocking Property of Additional Persons Contributing to the Situation in Venezuela"

Date issued: Jan. 31 2019

TURBOFAC Commentary (267 words)

Notes:

1) This FAQ and comments thereto were posted/written prior to the blocking of the Government of Venezuela pursuant to EO 13884. The FAQ was not updated in light of that development.

2) At the time this FAQ was posed, PdVSA was blocked pursuant to EO 13850, such that sanctions could be imposed an any person determined to have "materially assisted" PdVSA. In addition, the Venezuelan oil sector was deemed to be subject to the "operating in" designation criterion of Sec. 1(a)(i) of EO 13850. This FAQ is a notable illustration of the way in which, in general, OFAC avoids offering guidance on the scope of derivative designation criteria, and in particular the "material assistance" criterion. The question stem refers to the dealings of "non-U.S. persons" with PdVSA, and the answer only pertains to U.S. persons; in effect, OFAC avoids the question it puts to itself. This was not an accident.

For more on the way in which OFAC interprets the "operating in" designation criterion of EO 13850 with respect to the Venezuelan oil sector, including transactions with PdVSA, see General Note on "Sectoral Sanctions" and Determinations Made Pursuant to EOs Providing for the Blocking of Persons Determined to "Operate In" a Certain Sector (System Ed. Note), as well as Notable "Derivative" Designations - PB Tankers S.P.A. (Italy) (2019). For further discussion of the scope of derivative designation criteria as a whole, see General Note on Secondary Sanctions and “Derivative Designation” Criteria; Identification of the Gap Between the Theoretical and Practical Scopes of Authorities Targeting Transactions with no U.S. Nexus; Enforcement Risk Management (System Ed. Note).