OFAC FAQ (Current) # 63 - Compliance for the Insurance Industry [PDF contains amended version(s)]

Date issued: Nov. 13 2024

Last substantive commentary amendment:
Nov. 15 2024

TURBOFAC Commentary (349 words)

Notes:

1) The original version of this FAQ (concerning “cancel the policy, void the policy ab initio, non-renew the policy, refuse to pay claims under the policy”) suggested that any sort of exiting of an insurance policy in which a blocked person has an interest could be a “dealing” in such policy prohibited absent OFAC authorization. On 10-31-24, OFAC issued Compliance Communiqué - Sanctions Guidance for the Maritime Shipping Industry, suggesting that no license would be required to “terminate” blocked policies. On 11-13-24, OFAC amended this FAQ in a way that removed language suggesting that all manner of exiting a policy requires a license.

2) FAQ amended on 11-13-24 to clarify that when a single beneficiary to a policy is blocked, it is not necessarily the case that the entire policy is a blocked “contract”. More specifically, an “insurer is required to block the policy or relevant portion of the policy (e.g., the individual's policy under a group health insurance plan)”. This is an important “no interest” determination insofar as an insurance policy is a “contract,” but a blocked person being insured under the policy does not render the entire contract blocked, such that insurers would be prohibited from paying claims made by non-blocked individuals pursuant to the policy. Refer generally to General Note on the Blocking of “Contracts” and the Determination of Persons Having an “Interest” in “Contracts. Note that when a blocked person is an actual holder of a policy, including a group policy, the entire policy is blocked and all payments of claims are dealings in which the blocked policyholder has an interest. See American Life Insurance Company.

3) FAQ amended on 11-13-24 to clarify that insurance policies in which blocked persons have an interest must be reported to OFAC pursuant to the RPPR.

4) See GEICO General Insurance Company (2nd action) (2010), in which GEICO was fined for providing an automobile insurance policy to an SDN without an OFAC license and receiving two premium payments. See also enforcement actions pertaining to the insurance industry in general.