OFAC FAQ (Current) # 1258 - Cuba Sanctions

Date issued: Jun. 04 2026

TURBOFAC Commentary (251 words)

Notes:

1) Compare FAQ # 1254. This FAQ clarifies the relationship between the secondary sanctions/derivative designation provisions of EO 14404. GAESA, a large government-owned entity with ownership of many other entities in Cuba, was blocked pursuant to EO 14004 on May 7, 2026. OFAC now clarifies that “[s]anctions risk also extends to transactions with any entity in which GAESA, MININT, or MINFAR own, directly or indirectly, a 50 percent or greater interest,” and that “[n]on-U.S. persons should consider conducting enhanced due diligence to inform a risk-based approach to transactions with GAESA, MININT, MINFAR, or any entity in which they own, directly or indirectly, a 50 percent or greater interest.” Consistent with U.S. Sanctions Target Cuba’s Military Regime, Elites (Press Statement), OFAC’s emphasis on the question of whether a given entity is blocked pursuant to the 50 Percent Rule for secondary sanctions risk purposes is further evidence that OFAC does not intend on using the “material support” provision vis-à-vis the Government of Cuba as a bona fide “secondary sanctions” provision, otherwise the question of whether “GAESA, MININT, or MINFAR own, directly or indirectly, a 50 percent or greater interest” would not be entirely relevant. Instead, the question would be whether such entity is “Government of Cuba, any political subdivision, agency, or instrumentality thereof, including the Central Bank of Cuba, and any person owned, controlled, or acting for or on behalf of, the Government of Cuba” (a category far broader than those blocked pursuant to the 50 Percent Rule).