Ed. Note: if you’re new to TURBOFAC, please take note that the text string filtration function generally shouldn’t be used for terms such as “ordinarily resident,” “causing” or “new debt”. For research on the meaning of words and phrases such as those, i.e. terms central to the key legal issues in sanctions law that appear on a cross-programmatic basis, you’re typically better off locating and checking the appropriate box in the “Key Legal Issues” search category, which will limit the results to those that have been manually assessed as being relevant for the interpretation of the terms at issue.
Try typing your search term (“ordinarily resident,” “new debt,” or something else) in the “Find a Search Filter” box at the top of the page, and the corresponding “Key Legal Issues” check box will pop up instantly, if one exists. Once you check the box (e.g. “new debt,” with ~55 results), you can always use the text string filtration function to further refine your search (e.g. by typing “invoice” and narrowing the ~55 results to ~10).
Note in addition that the same applies to text string searches such as “14071” (if you’re looking for items related to EO 14071). By typing “14071” in the “Find a Search Filter” field up top, you will be able to instantly narrow the results down to items manually assessed as relating to EO 14071. Ditto terms such as “515.204” or “Iran General License G” (try the “Discrete Legal Provision” search category).
Please contact [email protected] or [email protected] with any questions on search results and efficiency.
Please click "Apply Text String Filters" again after clicking the "Close" button immediately below.
1) This press release marks the first ever designation based on the FFI “secondary sanctions” provision at section 11 of EO 14024, as amended by EO 14114. Notwithstanding the extremely broad scope of the provision (“conducted or facilitated any significant transaction or transactions, or provided any service, involving [a person blocked pursuant to EO 14024]”), the Keremet Bank designation is based on conduct that is egregious enough that it might have been the subject of a standard “materially assists” designation action but for the existence of section 11 of EO 14024 (i.e. material support provided to PSB in the form of facilitating “cross-border transfers on PSB’s behalf” as part of a “sanctions evasion scheme”. This is, notably, one of a very small handful of pure “secondary sanctions” enforcement actions against FFIs under any sanctions program, not just...