U.S. and UK Economic Sanctions Authorities - A Comparative Overview (June 23, 2026)

Date issued: Jun. 23 2026

TURBOFAC Commentary (251 words)

Notes:

1) This document is similar to the Introduction to the Office of Foreign Assets Control published shortly prior to the publication of this document, except this document is often even more elementary as it relates to OFAC, and it has the side-by-side comparison with UK sanctions. Except as described below, the document does not break new ground and is not otherwise notable as it relates to the scope and operation of OFAC’s laws or practices.

2) One aspect of the document that is notable is OFAC’s characterization of “Interpretive Guidance” from the licensing division as “formal” guidance, in contrast to “informal guidance” provided by the Compliance Hotline. We are not aware of this explicit “formal”/”informal” distinction made anywhere else, though it is not inconsistent with OFAC’s characterizations of the two.

3) OFAC reiterates/refreshes its guidance in FAQ # 7 that “Subject to sanctions program-specific considerations, non- U.S. persons do not generally risk being sanctioned for engaging in or facilitating transactions for which a U.S. person would not require a specific license.”

4) OFAC characterizes “Issuing a “Cease and Desist Letter” and “Revoking or suspending a license” as resolutions/responses to enforcement investigations. This appears to be a first.

5) It is notable that OFAC explicitly says “OFAC’s 50 Percent Rule speaks only to ownership and not to control,” which is consistent with FAQ # 398, notwithstanding the publication of the Guidance on Sham Transactions and Sanctions Evasion which some construed as a walk back of FAQ # 398.