PRINT
Sanctions on Entities Trading in or Transporting Iranian Petrochemicals
FACT SHEET
OFFICE OF THE SPOKESPERSON
MARCH 18, 2020
On March 18, the U.S. Department of State imposed sanctions, pursuant to Executive Order (E.O.) 13846, on the following seven entities for knowingly engaging in a significant transaction for the purchase, acquisition, sale, transport, or marketing of petrochemical products from Iran.
*South African company SPI International Proprietary Limited;
*Hong Kong-based companies McFly Plastic HK Limited, Saturn Oasis Co., Limited, and Sea Charming Shipping Company Limited; and
*Chinese companies Dalian Golden Sun Import & Export Co., Ltd., Tianyi International (Dalian) Co., Ltd., and Aoxing Ship Management (Shanghai) Ltd.
The U.S. Department of State imposed sanctions, pursuant to E.O. 13846, on the following two entities, each of which owns or controls SPI International Proprietary Limited and had knowledge of its sanctionable activities.
*South African company Main Street 1095; and
*Iranian entity Armed Forces Social Security Investment Company
The U.S. Department of State imposed sanctions, pursuant to E.O. 13846, on the following three individuals, each of which is an executive officer of one of the above entities.
*Mohammad Hassan Toulai, Managing Director of Armed Forces Social Security Investment Company;
*Hossein Tavakkoli, Director of SPI International Proprietary Limited; and
*Reza Ebadzadeh Semnani, Director of Main Street 1095
1) Compare with other sanctions imposed by the State Department pursuant to Sec. 3 of EO 13846, such as China Concord Petroleum Co., Limited, Kunlun Shipping Company Limited, Pegasus 88 Limited, and COSCO Shipping Tanker (Dalian) Seaman & Ship Management Co, Ltd. and Secondary Sanctions Enforcement Announcement - Zhuhai Zhenrong Company Limited. Note however this this appears to be the first time that sanctions are imposed pursuant to Sec. 3(a)(v) of EO 13846, which allows for sanctions on any person that "owns or controls a person determined by the Secretary of State in accordance with this section to meet any of the criteria set forth in subsections (a)(i)–(a)(iii) of [Sec. 3 of EO 13846], and had knowledge that the person engaged in the activities referred to in those subsections."
In this case, the rare invocation of the “upstream” sanction (i.e. sanctioning a parent company on the basis of the sections of a subsidiary) appears to be a function of the fact that, while nominally South African, the entity at issue was owned and/or controlled by or otherwise acting on behalf of the Iranian Government, and therefore subject to blocking sanctions pursuant to authorities other than EO 13846. It remains to be seen whether the precedent set in this announcement will spill over into non-Iranian parents of secondarily sanctioned third-country entities.