Secondary Sanctions Enforcement Announcement - Sanctions on Entities Trading in or Transporting Iranian Petrochemicals

Date issued: Mar. 18 2020

TURBOFAC Commentary (223 words)

Notes:

1) Compare with other sanctions imposed by the State Department pursuant to Sec. 3 of EO 13846, such as China Concord Petroleum Co., Limited, Kunlun Shipping Company Limited, Pegasus 88 Limited, and COSCO Shipping Tanker (Dalian) Seaman & Ship Management Co, Ltd. and Secondary Sanctions Enforcement Announcement - Zhuhai Zhenrong Company Limited. Note however this this appears to be the first time that sanctions are imposed pursuant to Sec. 3(a)(v) of EO 13846, which allows for sanctions on any person that "owns or controls a person determined by the Secretary of State in accordance with this section to meet any of the criteria set forth in subsections (a)(i)–(a)(iii) of [Sec. 3 of EO 13846], and had knowledge that the person engaged in the activities referred to in those subsections."

In this case, the rare invocation of the “upstream” sanction (i.e. sanctioning a parent company on the basis of the sections of a subsidiary) appears to be a function of the fact that, while nominally South African, the entity at issue was owned and/or controlled by or otherwise acting on behalf of the Iranian Government, and therefore subject to blocking sanctions pursuant to authorities other than EO 13846. It remains to be seen whether the precedent set in this announcement will spill over into non-Iranian parents of secondarily sanctioned third-country entities.