Ed. Note: if you’re new to TURBOFAC, please take note that the text string filtration function generally shouldn’t be used for terms such as “ordinarily resident,” “causing” or “new debt”. For research on the meaning of words and phrases such as those, i.e. terms central to the key legal issues in sanctions law that appear on a cross-programmatic basis, you’re typically better off locating and checking the appropriate box in the “Key Legal Issues” search category, which will limit the results to those that have been manually assessed as being relevant for the interpretation of the terms at issue.
Try typing your search term (“ordinarily resident,” “new debt,” or something else) in the “Find a Search Filter” box at the top of the page, and the corresponding “Key Legal Issues” check box will pop up instantly, if one exists. Once you check the box (e.g. “new debt,” with ~55 results), you can always use the text string filtration function to further refine your search (e.g. by typing “invoice” and narrowing the ~55 results to ~10).
Note in addition that the same applies to text string searches such as “14071” (if you’re looking for items related to EO 14071). By typing “14071” in the “Find a Search Filter” field up top, you will be able to instantly narrow the results down to items manually assessed as relating to EO 14071. Ditto terms such as “515.204” or “Iran General License G” (try the “Discrete Legal Provision” search category).
Please contact [email protected] or [email protected] with any questions on search results and efficiency.
Please click "Apply Text String Filters" again after clicking the "Close" button immediately below.
1) BACKGROUND
We ordinarily only include on-the-record statements on high ranking OFAC officials in the Research System when those officials are speaking on behalf of the agency, but this declaration from OFAC’s most recently departed (as of 2021) director provides a window into certain of OFAC’s licensing policies and practices that is both unique on substance and reliable. While the declaration was made at the behest of a private litigant, it was made under penalty of perjury, in connection with a case that OFAC is closely watching, and it was made relatively close in time to the former director's tenure at OFAC, so there is little reason to suspect that the statements in the declaration would not reflect OFAC's practices as of the date on which the declaration was made.
2a) EXPLANATION FOR OFAC’S NARROW INTERPRETATIONS OF THE BASIC BLOCKING PROHIBITION...