Enforcement Release - Newmont Corporation

Date issued: Apr. 21 2022

You've hit a wall. Sign in if you have an account, learn more about TURBOFAC and subscription options, or purchase access to the text of the document on this page, the native .pdf file, and the associated TURBOFAC original commentary.
TURBOFAC is a module of the compliance platform OverRuled. To learn more about OverRuled, visit www.overruled.com.

TURBOFAC Commentary (339 words)

Notes:

1) The Newmont and Chisu companion cases, which arise out of the same set of facts and were made public on the same day, are generally straightforward from a legal basis perspective.

In the Newmont case, Newmont (a U.S. entity) had a wholly owned and controlled subsidiary that was directly subject to the prohibitions of the CACR as a result of 515.329(d). For any such entity, it is prohibited to deal in goods of Cuban origin (515.204), even where the dealing does not actually involve a Cuban person.

This Chisu case appears to be, in principle, a ‘facilitation’ case, though it is not explicitly described as such because the CACR does not contain an explicit facilitation prohibition. Instead, facilitation is implicitly within the scope of the prohibitions of 515.201...