Notable Corresp. w/ the SEC re: Sanctions - Letter in re: Nokia Corporation Proposed Acquisition of Alcatel Lucent (2015)

Ed. Note: if you’re new to TURBOFAC, please take note that the text string filtration function generally shouldn’t be used for terms such as “ordinarily resident,” “causing” or “new debt”. For research on the meaning of words and phrases such as those, i.e. terms central to the key legal issues in sanctions law that appear on a cross-programmatic basis, you’re typically better off locating and checking the appropriate box in the “Key Legal Issues” search category, which will limit the results to those that have been manually assessed as being relevant for the interpretation of the terms at issue.

Try typing your search term (“ordinarily resident,” “new debt,” or something else) in the “Find a Search Filter” box at the top of the page, and the corresponding “Key Legal Issues” check box will pop up instantly, if one exists. Once you check the box (e.g. “new debt,” with ~55 results), you can always use the text string filtration function to further refine your search (e.g. by typing “invoice” and narrowing the ~55 results to ~10).

Note in addition that the same applies to text string searches such as “14071” (if you’re looking for items related to EO 14071). By typing “14071” in the “Find a Search Filter” field up top, you will be able to instantly narrow the results down to items manually assessed as relating to EO 14071. Ditto terms such as “515.204” or “Iran General License G” (try the “Discrete Legal Provision” search category). Please contact [email protected] or [email protected] with any questions on search results and efficiency.

Please click "Apply Text String Filters" again after clicking the "Close" button immediately below.

TURBOFAC Commentary (656 words)

Notes:

1) See incoming letter at https://www.sec.gov/divisions/corpfin/cf-noaction/2015/nokia-111715-14d10-incoming.pdf.

2) The correspondence is related to a case in which a de minimis amount of Cuban shareholding in a ~$16 billion-dollar company was a roadblock to a tender offer that, per applicable SEC rules, needed to be extended to all shareholders absent a specific exemption.

The incoming letter relays that OFAC examined the proposed transaction, concluded that the entire tender offer would have violated 515.202 absent a specific license, and recommended that the applicant refer to the SEC for an exemption. The SEC granted the exemption.

Counsel involved in the transaction reported the following:

As tender offers typically do not result in 100 percent ownership, obtaining SEC relief only postponed and did not definitively resolve the problem of needing to transact with the Sanctioned Persons. In most tender offers, a squeeze-out...

Welcome!

Welcome!

Letter in re: Nokia Corporation Proposed Acquisition of Alcatel Lucent (2015)

TURBOFAC Commentary (656 words)