PRINT
ENFORCEMENT INFORMATION FOR JANUARY 23, 2014
Clearstream Banking, S.A. Settles Potential Liability for Apparent Violations of Iranian Sanctions: Clearstream Banking, S.A. ("Clearstream"), Luxembourg, has agreed to remit $151,902,000 to settle potential civil liability for apparent violations of the Iranian Transactions and Sanctions Regulations ("ITSR"), 31 C.F.R. part 560.[1] From at least December 2007 through June 2008, Clearstream maintained an account at a U.S. financial institution in New York through which the Central Bank of Iran ("CBI") maintained a beneficial ownership interest in 26 securities, with a nominal value of $2.813 billion, held in custody at a central securities depository in the United States. Due to the omnibus nature of Clearstream’s account in New York, the CBI’s beneficial ownership interest in the 26 securities was not transparent to the U.S. financial institution. Clearstream, as intermediary, served as the channel through which the CBI held an interest in these...
Click the appropriate link below for access to this file.
Click the appropriate link below for access to this file.
1) This is the first case to establish that the provision of passive "custodial services" can constitute an "export" of a service from the U.S. to the location of the ultimate beneficiary, when, as here, a U.S. person is "caused" to hold securities for a non-U.S. customer that in turn uses an omnibus account to hold securities in which a sanctioned party has an interest.
2) Prior to the 2012 issue of EO 13599 (blocking all property and interests in property of the Government of Iran), the CBI was not a blocked party. Nevertheless, the sanctions in place at the time were such that the Government of Iran and all entities owned or controlled by the Government of Iran were ineligible to receive services from the U.S (560.410(b)), either directly or indirectly. Clearstream "caused" (560.203)...