Civil Enforcement Information - Clearstream Banking, S.A.

Date issued: Jan. 23 2014

Last substantive commentary amendment:
Mar. 15 2024

You've hit a wall. Sign in if you have an account, learn more about TURBOFAC and subscription options, or purchase access to the text of the document on this page, the native .pdf file, and the associated TURBOFAC original commentary.
TURBOFAC is a module of the compliance platform OverRuled. To learn more about OverRuled, visit www.overruled.com.

TURBOFAC Commentary (759 words)

Notes:

1) This is the first case to establish that the provision of passive "custodial services" can constitute an "export" of a service from the U.S. to the location of the ultimate beneficiary, when, as here, a U.S. person is "caused" to hold securities for a non-U.S. customer that in turn uses an omnibus account to hold securities in which a sanctioned party has an interest.

2) Prior to the 2012 issue of EO 13599 (blocking all property and interests in property of the Government of Iran), the CBI was not a blocked party. Nevertheless, the sanctions in place at the time were such that the Government of Iran and all entities owned or controlled by the Government of Iran were ineligible to receive services from the U.S (560.410(b)), either directly or indirectly. Clearstream "caused" (560.203)...