Civil Enforcement Information (FOV) - MasterCard International Incorporated

Date issued: Mar. 16 2016

TURBOFAC Commentary (173 words)

Notes:

1) OFAC declined to mention that MasterCard should have also been found to have violated the WMDPSR and GTSR by maintaining the accounts for Banks Saderat and Melli, even though those accounts had remained "dormant." In other contexts (see e.g. interpretive Guidance Letter Case No, IA-18717-1 (2013)), OFAC says that to "maintain an Iranian bank account," i.e. not take affirmative action to close an account, is to engage in the "prohibited importation of, or dealing in, Iranian origin services."

Similarly, maintaining an account for an SDN post-designation would be considered the provision of a service to that SDN (unless the account is blocked and thereby authorized by OFAC). Given that this is a public Finding of Violation, which OFAC publishes when it wants to signal something to the regulated community, this omission it probably more likely explained by OFAC preferring to use MasterCard to make its point with reference only to a procedural set of regulations, rather than the more politically and PR-sensitive WMDPSR and GTSR.