If this is your first time here, take a look at our FAQ page and get a sense of our unique scope of coverage by perusing the Research System interface.
Also, please note that this website is not yet fully functional on mobile browsers. We recommend adjusting your mobile browser settings to view the site in Desktop Mode.
If this is your first time here, take a look at our FAQ page and get a sense of our unique scope of coverage by perusing the Research System interface.
Ed. Note: if you’re new to TURBOFAC, please take note that the text string filtration function generally shouldn’t be used for terms such as “ordinarily resident,” “causing” or “new debt”. For research on the meaning of words and phrases such as those, i.e. terms central to the key legal issues in sanctions law that appear on a cross-programmatic basis, you’re typically better off locating and checking the appropriate box in the “Key Legal Issues” search category, which will limit the results to those that have been manually assessed as being relevant for the interpretation of the terms at issue.
Try typing your search term (“ordinarily resident,” “new debt,” or something else) in the “Find a Search Filter” box at the top of the page, and the corresponding “Key Legal Issues” check box will pop up instantly, if one exists. Once you check the box (e.g. “new debt,” with ~55 results), you can always use the text string filtration function to further refine your search (e.g. by typing “invoice” and narrowing the ~55 results to ~10).
Note in addition that the same applies to text string searches such as “14071” (if you’re looking for items related to EO 14071). By typing “14071” in the “Find a Search Filter” field up top, you will be able to instantly narrow the results down to items manually assessed as relating to EO 14071. Ditto terms such as “515.204” or “Iran General License G” (try the “Discrete Legal Provision” search category).
Please contact [email protected] or [email protected] with any questions on search results and efficiency.
Please click "Apply Text String Filters" again after clicking the "Close" button immediately below.
1) Along with Finans Kiymetli Madenler Turizm Otomotiv Gida Tekstil San. Ve Tic (2013), issued a month prior, this was the second of two examples of a non-U.S. entity other than a bank "causing" the export of a financial service from the U.S. to Iran. Note that the maximum penalty was issued because the violator did not respond to attempts to reach it.
2) See Settlement Agreement (OFAC) - CSE Global Limited and CSE TransTel Pte. Ltd. (2017), where OFAC explicitly articulates its basis for jurisdiction in such cases., where OFAC explicitly articulates its basis for jurisdiction in cases of exports from the U.S. made unwittingly as a result of actions taken by non-U.S. persons outside of the U.S.
3) Read in conjunction with the 2013 Advisory "The Use of Exchange Houses and Trading Companies to Evade U.S. Economic Sanctions Against Iran." This company appears to have been a fly-by-night front company.