August 22, 2008 DOJ Letter to Court on Behalf of OFAC in Rux v. ABN-AMRO, et al

Date issued: Aug. 22 2008

You've hit a wall. Sign in if you have an account, or learn more about TURBOFAC and subscription options.
TURBOFAC is a module of the compliance platform OverRuled. To learn more about OverRuled, visit www.overruled.com.

TURBOFAC Commentary (249 words)

Notes:

1) Compare Calderon-Cardona v. DBTCA 11 Civ. 3288, (Dkt. No. 90) (S.D.N.Y, 2006) -- USG Statement of Interest. This letter is notable for it being a statement directly attributable to OFAC concerning the conceptual gap bewteen the notion of an ownership interest in property an an "interest" as that term is broadly defined for purposes of OFAC's standard blocking regultaiosn. The key passage is as follows:

OFAC believes that a significant portion of the blocked assets at issue here likely are not subject to execution or attachment by plaintiffs because they are not assets of the Government of Sudan. This results from the broad regulatory definition of property "interest" described above, which can render assets not owned by the Government of Sudan subject to blocking. For example, many of the blocked assets are frozen wire transfers in...