Stansell et al v. FARC et al. 8:09-cv-02308-CEH-AAS (Dkt. 1197) (M.D.FL. 2019) – USG Statement of Interest

Date issued: Apr. 26 2019

You've hit a wall. Sign in if you have an account, or learn more about TURBOFAC and subscription options.
TURBOFAC is a module of the compliance platform OverRuled. To learn more about OverRuled, visit www.overruled.com.

TURBOFAC Commentary (253 words)

Notes:

1) CONSOLIDATED BACKGROUND ON DOCUMENTS RELATED TO STANSELL ET AL V. FARC LITIGATION AND OFAC CORRESPONDENCE

The Research System contains the following documents, all related to the same TRIA asset attachment litigation

*Stansell v. Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colom. (Mercurio) (11th Cir. 2013) - OFAC Amicus Brief (2011)
*Stansell v. Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colom. (Mercurio), 704 F.3d 910, 915–17 (11th Cir. 2013)
*Case No. FNK-2013-299796 (related to the Stansell v. Revolutionary Armed Forces Colom. case above)
*Stansell v. Revolutionary Armed Forces Colombia 771 F.3d 713 (11th Cir. 2014)
*Stansell et al v. FARC et al. 8:09-cv-02308-CEH-AAS (Dkt. 1197) (M.D.FL. 2019) – USG Statement of Interest (2019)

The litigation is fundamentally a FISA/TRIA attachment case, but some of...