Russia-related General License 69 - Authorizing Certain Debt Securities Servicing Transactions Involving International Investment Bank (May 31, 2023)

Date issued: May. 31 2023

TURBOFAC Commentary (329 words)

Notes:

1) The International Investment Bank (IIB) (https://iib.int/en) is a formerly multilateral development institution. According to Wikipedia:

Initially made it up of all Warsaw Pact members led by the Soviet Union alongside Cuba, Mongolia and Vietnam under the Eastern Bloc during the Cold War, IIB's membership was largely maintained until that point. East Germany withdrew from the IIB in 1990 following German reunification, Poland left in 2000 prior to joining the European Union and the Czech Republic and Slovakia (formerly part of Czechoslovakia) exited the organization following the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine with Bulgaria and Romania to follow. In April Hungary announced it was leaving as a result of sanctions on the Hungarian management of the bank.[2] This leaves Russia as the remaining European member of IIB.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Investment_Bank

The IIB was blocked pursuant to EO 14024 on 04/12/2023. On May 25, 2023, the bank issued a statement that:

"as a result of the imposed US OFAC sanctions, all correspondent banking entities of IIB in the EU blocked all transactions in connection with IIB, including Bank’s nostro accounts in EUR, USD, HUF, CZK, RON.

By the decisions of the correspondent banking entities, IIB is technically unable to make payments under standard payment arrangements and therefore has been deprived of the possibility to fulfil obligations in the abovementioned currencies to bondholders, creditors and clients."

This GL is clearly designed at rectifying that problem, particularly as it relates to non-Russian creditors of the bank.

2) As with Russia-related GL 43, this GL explicitly states that "U.S. financial institutions are authorized to unblock interest or principal payments that were blocked on or after April 12, 2023 but before May 31, 2023" because of the gap between the blocking of the relevant bank and the issuance of this GL. If the two were done concurrently, there would have been no "blocking" of the interest and principal payments to begin with (and no report filed).