If this is your first time here, take a look at our FAQ page and get a sense of our unique scope of coverage by perusing the Research System interface.
Also, please note that this website is not yet fully functional on mobile browsers. We recommend adjusting your mobile browser settings to view the site in Desktop Mode.
If this is your first time here, take a look at our FAQ page and get a sense of our unique scope of coverage by perusing the Research System interface.
Ed. Note: if you’re new to TURBOFAC, please take note that the text string filtration function generally shouldn’t be used for terms such as “ordinarily resident,” “causing” or “new debt”. For research on the meaning of words and phrases such as those, i.e. terms central to the key legal issues in sanctions law that appear on a cross-programmatic basis, you’re typically better off locating and checking the appropriate box in the “Key Legal Issues” search category, which will limit the results to those that have been manually assessed as being relevant for the interpretation of the terms at issue.
Try typing your search term (“ordinarily resident,” “new debt,” or something else) in the “Find a Search Filter” box at the top of the page, and the corresponding “Key Legal Issues” check box will pop up instantly, if one exists. Once you check the box (e.g. “new debt,” with ~55 results), you can always use the text string filtration function to further refine your search (e.g. by typing “invoice” and narrowing the ~55 results to ~10).
Note in addition that the same applies to text string searches such as “14071” (if you’re looking for items related to EO 14071). By typing “14071” in the “Find a Search Filter” field up top, you will be able to instantly narrow the results down to items manually assessed as relating to EO 14071. Ditto terms such as “515.204” or “Iran General License G” (try the “Discrete Legal Provision” search category).
Please contact [email protected] or [email protected] with any questions on search results and efficiency.
Please click "Apply Text String Filters" again after clicking the "Close" button immediately below.
Date issued: Nov. 21 2024
1) Except as described below, this is standard "debt/equity" GL, as issued in the Russian context (compare e.g. Russia GL 43 and Russia GL 48), that does not license against Directive 4 Under EO 14024. Refer generally to General Note on GLs and Other Types of Authorizations as Applied to Dealings in or Related to Securities of Sanctioned Issuers, for comments on the scope of the typical wind down GL containing language similar to this one.
2) This is the third ever GL of this type that explicitly authorizes dealings in debt "guaranteed" by specified blocked parties. The implication is that any debt instrument guaranteed is debt in which a blocked person has an interest, such that OFAC authorization is required to deal in such debt. Compare Opening Securities and Futures Accounts from an OFAC Perspective (OFAC implies that a blocked person acting as "guarantor" on an account would render that account property in which the guarantor has an interest, and thereby blockable). See Examples Illustrating the Operation of the “Interest" Concept as Applied to Certain Securities and Derivatives.
3) See Russia-related General License 113 (general wind down GL that applies to Gazprombank and Interstate Bank).
4) By licensing against the entirety of EO 14024 without a carveout for Directive 3 Under EO 14024, this GL appears to implicitly license against Directive 3 Under EO 14024 (debt/equity) to which Gazprombank has been subject since 2-24-22. Is it a mistake/oversight that this GL authorizes transactions that implicated Directive 3 Under EO 14024 that were prohibited prior to the 11-21-24 blocking action? We would imagine so.
5) This GL was issued after the expiration of Russia-related General License 100 (NSD), was issued for the specific purpose of allowing dealings in “debt or equity” of Gazprombank, but does not authorize “[a]ny transactions otherwise prohibited by the RuHSR, including transactions involving any person blocked pursuant to the RuHSR other than [Gazprombank or Interstate] unless separately authorized.” See FAQ # 1197, and query whether and to what extent a lingering “interest” of NSD in Gazprombank or Interstate securities renders this GL inoperative with respect to such securities.