Russia-related General License 114 - Authorizing Certain Transactions Related to Debt or Equity of, or Derivative Contracts Involving, Certain Entities Blocked on November 21, 2024 (November 21, 2024)

Date issued: Nov. 21 2024

TURBOFAC Commentary (361 words)

Notes:

1) Except as described below, this is standard "debt/equity" GL, as issued in the Russian context (compare e.g. Russia GL 43 and Russia GL 48), that does not license against Directive 4 Under EO 14024. Refer generally to General Note on GLs and Other Types of Authorizations as Applied to Dealings in or Related to Securities of Sanctioned Issuers, for comments on the scope of the typical wind down GL containing language similar to this one.

2) This is the third ever GL of this type that explicitly authorizes dealings in debt "guaranteed" by specified blocked parties. The implication is that any debt instrument guaranteed is debt in which a blocked person has an interest, such that OFAC authorization is required to deal in such debt. Compare Opening Securities and Futures Accounts from an OFAC Perspective (OFAC implies that a blocked person acting as "guarantor" on an account would render that account property in which the guarantor has an interest, and thereby blockable). See Examples Illustrating the Operation of the “Interest" Concept as Applied to Certain Securities and Derivatives.

3) See Russia-related General License 113 (general wind down GL that applies to Gazprombank and Interstate Bank).

4) By licensing against the entirety of EO 14024 without a carveout for Directive 3 Under EO 14024, this GL appears to implicitly license against Directive 3 Under EO 14024 (debt/equity) to which Gazprombank has been subject since 2-24-22. Is it a mistake/oversight that this GL authorizes transactions that implicated Directive 3 Under EO 14024 that were prohibited prior to the 11-21-24 blocking action? We would imagine so.

5) This GL was issued after the expiration of Russia-related General License 100 (NSD), was issued for the specific purpose of allowing dealings in “debt or equity” of Gazprombank, but does not authorize “[a]ny transactions otherwise prohibited by the RuHSR, including transactions involving any person blocked pursuant to the RuHSR other than [Gazprombank or Interstate] unless separately authorized.” See FAQ # 1197, and query whether and to what extent a lingering “interest” of NSD in Gazprombank or Interstate securities renders this GL inoperative with respect to such securities.