General Note on Enforcement Actions Resulting From “Bank-to-Bank” Transactions that Only Indirectly Involve Sanctions Targets (“Complex Payment Structures,” Structurally Linked Transactions, etc.)

You've hit a wall. Sign in if you have an account, learn more about TURBOFAC and subscription options, or purchase access to the text of the document on this page, the native .pdf file, and the associated TURBOFAC original commentary.
TURBOFAC is a module of the compliance platform OverRuled. To learn more about OverRuled, visit www.overruled.com.

TURBOFAC Commentary (4655 words)

General Note on Enforcement Actions Resulting From “Bank-to-Bank” Transactions that Only Indirectly Involve Sanctions Targets (“Complex Payment Structures,” Structurally Linked Transactions, etc.)

1) BACKGROUND

One of the more opaque aspects of bank-related sanctions compliance—especially as it relates to the routing payments through the U.S. financial system by banks not otherwise subject to primary sanctions prohibition—is the lack of a clear sense of what sort of bank-to-bank transactions not involving prohibited parties on their faces are nevertheless prohibited, e.g. because they "cause" a U.S. financial institution to "export" financial services to a sanctioned destination, because they "cause" a U.S. financial institution to export financial services to a sanctioned destination, or both. By “bank-to-bank payments” and/or “bank-to-bank” transactions, we refer to transactions between one or more banks where the beneficiary or beneficiaries of a given payment (or securities or other transaction) is a bank itself, rather...