Notable "Derivative" Designations - Mid Oil Asia; Singa Tankers; Siqiriya Maritime; Ferland Company Limited; Vitaly Sokolenko

Date issued: Dec. 12 2013

Last substantive commentary amendment:
Jun. 12 2023

TURBOFAC Commentary (245 words)

Notes:

1) Refer to Introductory Note Common to all Derivative Designation Notices Included in the Research System (System Ed. Note). That note explains the specific criteria used for determining which designation notices are included.

2) Five were entities designated for providing "material support" to the National Iranian Tanker Company, an Iranian SDN. These designations were made pursuant to EO13645, Sec. 2(a)(i), which implemented Section 1244 of IFCA and imposed additional sanctions on Iran. That EO was eventually revoked as part of the JCPOA, and upon the withdrawal from the JCPOA, those same sanctions were reimposed by EO 13846, Sec. 1(a)(iii).

In spite of the fact the sanction was imposed pursuant to a provision implementing IFCA--which is generally referred to as a "secondary sanctions" statute--OFAC would not consider this to be a "secondary sanctions" enforcement action, as the "material assistance" designation criterion is not referred to as a "secondary sanction." In practice, however, derivative designation criteria often operate in a manner similar to secondary sanctions. See General Note on Secondary Sanctions and “Derivative Designation” Criteria; Identification of the Gap Between the Theoretical and Practical Scopes of Authorities Targeting Transactions with no U.S. Nexus; Enforcement Risk Management (System Ed. Note).

3) Refer to section 2(b)(i) of the comments to Case No. IA-2018-357507-1, concerning OFAC’s apparent reluctance to designate non-U.S. persons for transactions sanctionable solely as a result of sections 1(a)(iii)(A), 1(a)(iv)(C) or 2(a)(ii) of EO 13846 (or subsection 1244(c)(2)(C)(iii) of IFCA).