Ed. Note: if you’re new to TURBOFAC, please take note that the text string filtration function generally shouldn’t be used for terms such as “ordinarily resident,” “causing” or “new debt”. For research on the meaning of words and phrases such as those, i.e. terms central to the key legal issues in sanctions law that appear on a cross-programmatic basis, you’re typically better off locating and checking the appropriate box in the “Key Legal Issues” search category, which will limit the results to those that have been manually assessed as being relevant for the interpretation of the terms at issue.
Try typing your search term (“ordinarily resident,” “new debt,” or something else) in the “Find a Search Filter” box at the top of the page, and the corresponding “Key Legal Issues” check box will pop up instantly, if one exists. Once you check the box (e.g. “new debt,” with ~55 results), you can always use the text string filtration function to further refine your search (e.g. by typing “invoice” and narrowing the ~55 results to ~10).
Note in addition that the same applies to text string searches such as “14071” (if you’re looking for items related to EO 14071). By typing “14071” in the “Find a Search Filter” field up top, you will be able to instantly narrow the results down to items manually assessed as relating to EO 14071. Ditto terms such as “515.204” or “Iran General License G” (try the “Discrete Legal Provision” search category).
Please contact [email protected] or [email protected] with any questions on search results and efficiency.
Please click "Apply Text String Filters" again after clicking the "Close" button immediately below.
1) Because the Research System commentary is focused primarily on the scope and operation of OFAC's prohibitions, licenses, and exemptions—rather than the enforcement guidelines determining the severity of penalties once the prohibitions have been violated—we defer extensive comment on this FR notice.
2) As it relates to the fundamental scope of the prohibitions, one notable aspect of this commentary on the enforcement guidelines is OFAC confirming that even the actions of "rogue employees" will be attributed to organizations employing such persons, with penalties to be assessed against the employing organization to be potentially mitigated on the basis of the underlying facts. To some degree, this can be viewed as a statement concerning the scope of the term “U.S. person,” or OFAC’s general view of the jurisdictional scope of its primary sanctions prohibitions. For example, a U.S. person organization will be held liable for the actions of...