OFAC FAQ (Current) # 68 - Compliance for the Insurance Industry [PDF contains amended version(s)]

Date issued: Nov. 13 2024

Last substantive commentary amendment:
Nov. 15 2024

You've hit a wall. Sign in if you have an account, or learn more about TURBOFAC and subscription options.
TURBOFAC is a module of the compliance platform OverRuled. To learn more about OverRuled, visit www.overruled.com.

TURBOFAC Commentary (406 words)

Notes to FAQ 68 and FAQ 69:

1) This appears to be an acknowledgement that OFAC’s definition of the term "service," or "services of any nature whatsoever" would not cover such a notification. Compare the expansive view of the term "service" taken in e.g. Civil Enforcement Information - ExxonMobil Corporation (2017), and compare FAQ 41, permitting notification in the banking context that funds are blocked without first obtaining a license prior to the communication and where no general license covers the activity.

In FAQ 69, OFAC says that an insurer may, without a license, send a letter stating that any further payments are subject to blocking. This too appears to not constitute a "service," within the broad meaning of the term, and the letter would not be "property" in which a blocked person has an interest. Note that the communication...