OFAC FAQ (Current) # 5 - Assessing OFAC Name Matches

Date issued: Sep. 09 2026

TURBOFAC Commentary (284 words)

Notes:

[9-9-26 Update – amended to note that “OFAC does not provide guidance on potential matches unrelated to OFAC sanctions,” that a “tool may exclude [weak] aliases as part of a risk-based decision,” to give guidance on how to clear false positives, to specify that “If after you review available information, you can reasonably determine the match is not valid, then you may proceed with the transaction or activity” (indicating tolerance for some risk of failure), to “promote” the use of “OFAC authorizations or exemptions,” to detail the difference between blocking and rejecting, and to specify that “Organizations should keep complete, accurate records detailing the steps taken to investigate the potential match and the information relied upon to ultimately determine whether the potential match was valid.”] The FAQ also says that “If you block property or reject transactions or activity due to OFAC sanctions, you must report the action to OFAC within 10 business days.” Which, as with other guidance, indicates that the 10 days is 10 days from the time of the blocking or rejection, not 10 days from the time blockable property came within the possession or control of a U.S. person. Finally, the guidance states that “OFAC does not confirm potential matches or false positives to our sanctions lists and instead encourages organizations to make risk-based determinations consistent with the guidance above,” which appears to be the first time OFAC has made such a statement (contrast e.g. OFAC Compliance Guidance in re: Mistaken ID).

As a multitude of enforcement actions demonstrate, there is a range of scenarios in which OFAC's due diligence expectations entail a degree of forensic investigation that extends beyond the sort of screening referenced here.