OFAC FAQ (Current) # 498 - Cross-Programmatic Compliance Services Guidance

Date issued: Jan. 12 2017

TURBOFAC Commentary (224 words)

Notes:

1) See detailed discussion on the guidance at comments to Guidance on the Provision of Certain Services Relating to the Requirements of U.S. Sanctions Laws, including what OFAC appears to have in mind concerning the "import" of "services." Engaging Iranian lawyers and other service providers for the purpose of conducting Iran-related due diligence would apparently constitute a prohibited import of a service, even if the service is provided specifically for the purpose of ensuring compliance with sanctions laws. Recall that the guidance is not a license, but instead a view on what is "not prohibited" by the broad sanctions prohibitions. As discussed in notes to the Compliance Services Guidance, OFAC warns, in Footnote 2 of IPSA International Services (2017), that the engagement of people ordinarily resident in Iran in connection with the provision of compliance guidance is within the scope of the prohibitions of the ITSR. The performance of due diligence on potential counterparties seems to be one of the things OFAC may have in mind as something that would constitute the "importation of services" within the meaning of 560.201.

2) Note that the scope of the legal services general licenses in virtually all sanctions programs covers a significant amount of sanctions compliance advice-related activity that is outside the scope of what is deemed not prohibited in the guidance.