OFAC FAQ (Current) # 36 - Blocking and Rejecting Transactions

Date issued: Aug. 11 2020

You've hit a wall. Sign in if you have an account, or learn more about TURBOFAC and subscription options.
TURBOFAC is a module of the compliance platform OverRuled. To learn more about OverRuled, visit www.overruled.com.

TURBOFAC Commentary (406 words)

Notes:

1) See e.g. Wachovia Bank (2007) for an enforcement action based on the rejection of a wire transfer that should have been blocked.

2) FAQ amended on Aug. 11, 2020 "to reflect that Sudan has not been a comprehensively sanctioned country since October 12, 2017" (see https://web.archive.org/web/20221207223105/https://home.treasury.gov/policy-issues/financial-sanctions/recent-actions/20200811).

The original FAQ read as follows:

36. I understand blocking a transaction, but what is meant by rejecting a transaction? When should a transaction be rejected rather than blocked?
In some cases, an underlying transaction may be prohibited, but there is no blockable interest in the transaction. In these cases, the transaction is simply rejected, or not processed. For example, a U.S. bank would have to reject a wire transfer between two third-country companies (non-SDNs) involving an export to a company in Sudan...