OFAC FAQ (Current) # 901 - Chinese Military Companies Sanctions

Date issued: Jun. 03 2021

You've hit a wall. Sign in if you have an account, learn more about TURBOFAC and subscription options, or purchase access to the text of the document on this page, the native .pdf file, and the associated TURBOFAC original commentary.
TURBOFAC is a module of the compliance platform OverRuled. To learn more about OverRuled, visit www.overruled.com.

TURBOFAC Commentary (183 words)

Notes:

1) By the standards of ordinary OFAC-administered sanctions programs, this FAQ constitutes a derogation from the norm as it relates to diligence expectations, and in particular the question of whether a U.S. person "knows or has a reason to know" of the facts and circumstances underlying potentially violative conduct. The default is ‘trust but verify,’ whereas here it appears to be ‘trust’. See section 3(ii) of General Note on the Terms "Knowingly," "Should Have Known" And "Reason to Know" In the Primary Sanctions, Secondary Sanctions and Derivative Designation Contexts (System Ed. Note) for general comments on the “may rely” / “may reasonably rely” statement contained herein.

As it relates to securities exchanges in particular, see comment to FAQ # 871. In the absence of the now-revoked GL authorizing securities exchanges to engage in...