Ed. Note: if you’re new to TURBOFAC, please take note that the text string filtration function generally shouldn’t be used for terms such as “ordinarily resident,” “causing” or “new debt”. For research on the meaning of words and phrases such as those, i.e. terms central to the key legal issues in sanctions law that appear on a cross-programmatic basis, you’re typically better off locating and checking the appropriate box in the “Key Legal Issues” search category, which will limit the results to those that have been manually assessed as being relevant for the interpretation of the terms at issue.
Try typing your search term (“ordinarily resident,” “new debt,” or something else) in the “Find a Search Filter” box at the top of the page, and the corresponding “Key Legal Issues” check box will pop up instantly, if one exists. Once you check the box (e.g. “new debt,” with ~55 results), you can always use the text string filtration function to further refine your search (e.g. by typing “invoice” and narrowing the ~55 results to ~10).
Note in addition that the same applies to text string searches such as “14071” (if you’re looking for items related to EO 14071). By typing “14071” in the “Find a Search Filter” field up top, you will be able to instantly narrow the results down to items manually assessed as relating to EO 14071. Ditto terms such as “515.204” or “Iran General License G” (try the “Discrete Legal Provision” search category).
Please contact [email protected] or [email protected] with any questions on search results and efficiency.
Please click "Apply Text String Filters" again after clicking the "Close" button immediately below.
1) This is one of the eight EO 13959-related FAQs that remains on OFAC’s website after the release of EO 14032 of June 3, 2021, which substantially altered the sanctions regime pertaining to Chinese military company-related securities. The plain text view of the FAQ included the text of the FAQ as it appeared prior to June 3, 2021.
2) The "publicly traded securities" issue is discussed at section II(i) of the Consolidated Comment on the Chinese Military Companies Sanctions Under the EO Issued June 3, 2021.
3) In section 4(d) of the original EO 13959, there was a definitional provision that read as follows (with emphasis added):
the terms ‘‘security’’ and ‘‘securities’’ include the definition of ‘‘security’’ in section 3(a)(10) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Public Law 73–291, as codified as amended at...