Ed. Note: if you’re new to TURBOFAC, please take note that the text string filtration function generally shouldn’t be used for terms such as “ordinarily resident,” “causing” or “new debt”. For research on the meaning of words and phrases such as those, i.e. terms central to the key legal issues in sanctions law that appear on a cross-programmatic basis, you’re typically better off locating and checking the appropriate box in the “Key Legal Issues” search category, which will limit the results to those that have been manually assessed as being relevant for the interpretation of the terms at issue.
Try typing your search term (“ordinarily resident,” “new debt,” or something else) in the “Find a Search Filter” box at the top of the page, and the corresponding “Key Legal Issues” check box will pop up instantly, if one exists. Once you check the box (e.g. “new debt,” with ~55 results), you can always use the text string filtration function to further refine your search (e.g. by typing “invoice” and narrowing the ~55 results to ~10).
Note in addition that the same applies to text string searches such as “14071” (if you’re looking for items related to EO 14071). By typing “14071” in the “Find a Search Filter” field up top, you will be able to instantly narrow the results down to items manually assessed as relating to EO 14071. Ditto terms such as “515.204” or “Iran General License G” (try the “Discrete Legal Provision” search category).
Please contact [email protected] or [email protected] with any questions on search results and efficiency.
Please click "Apply Text String Filters" again after clicking the "Close" button immediately below.
1) The context of this forfeiture license is unusual in that the government filed the Verified Complaint for Forfeiture in Rem (in Aug. 2012) prior to the (Feb. 2013) blocking of the owner of the funds, and it was only after the warrant for arrest in rem had been issued that the funds became blocked. Based on the docket associated with this case, OFAC was evidently not of the view that the mere continuing with the forfeiture proceedings required a license (e.g. because it was a “judicial process…with respect to…” blocked property). See 598.202(e). Indeed, the license only after the “final judgment of forfeiture” (p. 8) had been issued.
2) § 1904(d) of the Kingpin Act (FNKDA) provides that “[n]othing in [the FNKDA] prohibits or otherwise limits the authorized law enforcement...