Case No. CU-77803; License No. CU-77803

Date issued: Jun. 26 2008

You've hit a wall. Sign in if you have an account, learn more about TURBOFAC and subscription options, or purchase access to the text of the document on this page, the native .pdf file, and the associated TURBOFAC original commentary.
TURBOFAC is a module of the compliance platform OverRuled. To learn more about OverRuled, visit www.overruled.com.

TURBOFAC Commentary (138 words)

Notes:

1) Case No. CU-77803 appears to take the position that FOIA is an administrative proceeding that is within the scope of the standard legal services general license (receipt of fees for FOIA proceeding were authorized, but not the provision of services in connection with the FOIA requests, implying that they were already authorized). It may be that any proceeding reviewable under the APA qualifies as an “administrative proceeding” for the purposes of the standard legal services GL. The challenging of the blocking of funds is also withing the scope of the legal services GL.

2) The licensing policy articulated here should not come as much of a surprise -- reimbursement for FOIA costs are not an expense worthy of payment from blocked funds, even when the FOIA request was made the challenge the...