American Airways Charters, Inc. v. Regan, 746 F.2d 865 (D.C. Cir. 1984)

Date issued: Oct. 23 1984

You've hit a wall. Sign in if you have an account, learn more about TURBOFAC and subscription options, or purchase access to the text of the document on this page, the native .pdf file, and the associated TURBOFAC original commentary.
TURBOFAC is a module of the compliance platform OverRuled. To learn more about OverRuled, visit www.overruled.com.

TURBOFAC Commentary (677 words)

Notes:

1) OFAC’S JURISDICTION OVER THE FORMATION OF ATTORNEY-CLIENT RELATIONSHIPS; UNCOMPENSATED LEGAL REPRESENTATION

Prior to this decision, OFAC considered the TWEA (and presumably IEEPA) to give OFAC jurisdiction over the formation of attorney-client relationships between sanctioned persons and persons subject to U.S. jurisdiction. Here, the D.C. Circuit makes clear that this is not the case, i.e. that "the Office of Foreign Assets Control lacks authority [under TWEA] to condition the bare formation of an attorney-client relationship on advance government approval."

OFAC's current practices are not entirely inconsistent with this opinion, and the USG has acknowledged it in various fora. See e.g. the USG/OFAC appellate brief in Empresa Cubana Exportadora v. Department of Treasury, et al. (D.C. Cir. 2011). The brief cites American Airways Charters,...