United States v. Robert Wise (SDNY, 2023 (S1 23 Cr. 73 (MKV))

Date issued: Apr. 25 2023

You've hit a wall. Sign in if you have an account, learn more about TURBOFAC and subscription options, or purchase access to the text of the document on this page, the native .pdf file, and the associated TURBOFAC original commentary.
TURBOFAC is a module of the compliance platform OverRuled. To learn more about OverRuled, visit www.overruled.com.

TURBOFAC Commentary (188 words)

Notes:

The United States v. Robert Wise prosecution is a rare, if not altogether unique, case against a U.S. lawyer for sanctions violations. See https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/new-york-attorney-pleads-guilty-conspiring-commit-money-laundering-promote-sanctions for further factual information. The DOJ says that Wise, in paying to maintain properties indirectly owned by an SDN, used “international wire transfers to conduct U.S. dollar transactions for the benefit of [the SDN Viktor Vekselberg].” In technical terms, Wise was dealing in property (i.e. the funds wired to him before and after Vekselberg’s designation), in which Vekselberg had an indirect interest. Alternatively, Wise was “making [a] contribution or provision of funds, goods, or services by, to, or for the benefit of,” or here the indirect benefit of, Vekselberg. Wise was also providing financial services "with respect to" (589.405(b)(2)) property (i.e. the real properties) that was...